Sunday, January 11, 2015

What is your Coaching Philosophy?






HOLIDAYS  BRING an opportunity to take a break and importantly reflect.

During the year I read in the sports media, when a new coach is appointed it referred to thier coaching philosophy, and to the young candidates that failed to get the nod  they were encouraged to take the rebuff as an opportunity to get clarity for their own coaching philosophy .

This got me thinking as what my own executive coaching philosophy is?

With contemplation I formulated  into 10 foundation keys which form the basis of my own coaching philosophy:
( I have divided into two halves for ease of reading.)

1/ Radiant thinking
In Coaching we must start somewhere. I practice radiant thinking, starting  with yourself, the Coach. First, I ask could I add value to this person, could I work with this person,
do I have empathy, what is my first impression, will this person be low or high maintenance and finally can we have some fun on the journey? These are questions I may have skipped over in my younger years, but now realised life is to short to work with people who may not meet this  criteria. Don’t get me wrong, I believe it is not about me its about them, but the relationship must be built on a foundation of respect and trust,  win/win outcomes.

2/ Never offer a solution until you first have the listener  speak the problem
We being coaches are so eager to solve problems and offer advice, even when it hasn’t been asked for or verbalised. We don’t stop to ask if this is their problem, we are impatient and eager to set things right.
The listener nods his or her head …but doesn’t hear a thing!  So save your time and the frustration  when we realise the advice we suggested has not been taken.
The President of Mattel Toys (makers of Barbie and GI Joe) said: “Don’t offer a solution until the prospect verbalises the problem.
Excellent advice and true. But how you ask? That is the skill and discipline of a trusted adviser. Disciplined to refrain from offering the answer. And skill to ask the questions which will get the person to identify and voice the problem. If we say it they half believe it, if they say it they 100% believe.

3/ Save the Plasma for the Living
Not everyone will welcome your advice or take it. Some people are beyond help or have a greater desire to be the eternal victim. Or maybe its just a timing thing.
Salve your ego, and move on. Save your time and hurt and transfer your attention to those who want to be better than what  they presently, respect you and will actually put to action what you have recommended

4/ Three strikes you’re out.
You are most likely like me, in that you tend to see the world through rose colored glasses and give people continuous chances in their dealing with you. It might come with age but at some stage you say "what’s happening here?”. I now give people 3 chances for major misdemeanours. On the 3rd strike I adjust my relationship and in many cases move on- whether they be associates or  clients. This may be a little harsh and I am sure it is totally not their fault, but for whatever reason I settle for  less hassle and stress in my life.

5/ Its okay to fail
I once believed that failure was not an option and when it did I saw it as a total failure of me. In one business venture, I vowed I would succeed or  die trying. The latter I nearly realised. I learned before it was too late that sometime you must walk away if it is not working- for what ever reason. Failure should always be considered a valid option. It is foolishly and delusion to think otherwise. If you can walk away after giving it your best shot. Similarly you should sometimes tell the bad news to a client you are coaching if it’s not working for them. Time to shut shop and try something else. They will likely at some point thank you.

6/ The Question mark is more powerful than the Explanation point.
If we are going to bring about meaningful, sustainable change we must disturb the pattern of our client’s  thinking . This can only be done through questions which on one hand shows respect and on the other hand asks for  a review of their attitudes and current stand. We habitually make statements (which of course is figuratively followed by and exclamation mark) and is challenging the other party position. The  most likely response is for them to dig in and defend their position.

So it is with questions we are going to get the others  to embrace change. Try it!

What is your coaching philosophy?